| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the 2200U gets 68.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 8 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
810f10
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2/4
TDP
115 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
71.02k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
11.67k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
14.02k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
4.53k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
2.93k (x0.68)
TOTAL
31.6k
33.14k (x1.05)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
20.49k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
31.32k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
9.99k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
3.03k (x0.26)
TOTAL
536.99k
64.82k (x0.12)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
11.54k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
19.69k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.55k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
3.25k (x0.89)
TOTAL
28.23k
39.03k (x1.38)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
19.25k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
36.27k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
10.2k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
3.07k (x0.35)
TOTAL
551.1k
68.8k (x0.12)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
1283 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
2418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
680 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
205 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
4586 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
3394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
5792 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
956 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
11480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4