| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs A9 9420


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the 9420 gets 26.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 21 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
670f00
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2/2
TDP
115 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
46.33k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
8.41k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
11.48k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
3.29k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
2.24k (x0.52)
TOTAL
31.6k
25.41k (x0.8)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

9420
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
11.25k (x0.05)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
13.69k (x0.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
2.09k (x0.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
1.87k (x0.16)
TOTAL
536.99k
28.89k (x0.05)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
7.55k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
13.9k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.11k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
2.18k (x0.59)
TOTAL
28.23k
26.74k (x0.95)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

9420
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
9.09k (x0.04)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
12.25k (x0.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
3k (x0.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
1.81k (x0.21)
TOTAL
551.1k
26.15k (x0.05)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
606 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
817 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
1743 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
2096 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
3862 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
864 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
604 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
7427 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4