| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core m3-7Y30


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 8.6 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806e9
Core
Haswell-EP
Kaby Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
120 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
52.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
10.02k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
9.22k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
2.04k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
4.31k (x1.32)
TOTAL
36.41k
25.6k (x0.7)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
21.75k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
20.51k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
4.97k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
5.56k (x0.83)
TOTAL
452.9k
52.78k (x0.12)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
11730 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4