Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i7-10870H
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0652
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
487.05k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
4.77k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
19.81k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
6.29k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
14.03k (x4.48)
TOTAL
18.17k
44.9k (x2.47)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
31.21k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
151.01k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
50.13k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
8.37k (x0.88)
TOTAL
182.59k
240.71k (x1.32)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
17.17k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
25.26k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
6.7k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
13.81k (x4.21)
TOTAL
27.11k
62.95k (x2.32)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
116.68k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
187.28k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
51.52k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
8.39k (x1.26)
TOTAL
325.78k
363.87k (x1.12)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
16.14k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
24.74k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
5.98k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
12.7k (x4.07)
TOTAL
27.57k
59.55k (x2.16)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
117.03k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
199.88k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
50.64k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
8.23k (x1.22)
TOTAL
338.73k
375.77k (x1.11)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
30.38k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
27.95k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
6.51k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
14.37k (x4.41)
TOTAL
36.41k
79.2k (x2.18)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
216.18k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
210.82k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
51.57k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
8.47k (x1.26)
TOTAL
452.9k
487.05k (x1.08)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4