Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i7-10700
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0655
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16386 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
537.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
30.66k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
25.64k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
5.98k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
12.25k (x3.76)
TOTAL
36.41k
74.53k (x2.05)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
240.28k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
234.3k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
56.12k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
7.02k (x1.05)
TOTAL
452.9k
537.73k (x1.19)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
8273 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4