| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
706e5
Core
Haswell-EP
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2014
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
4.05k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
15.29k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
9.04k (x3.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
10.54k (x3.37)
TOTAL
18.17k
38.92k (x2.14)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
9.05k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
33.88k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
15.34k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
6.74k (x0.71)
TOTAL
182.59k
65.01k (x0.36)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
7.07k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
10.55k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
5.27k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
5.66k (x1.73)
TOTAL
27.11k
28.56k (x1.05)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
25.28k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
37.48k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
17.77k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
6.92k (x1.04)
TOTAL
325.78k
87.45k (x0.27)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
13.9k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
20.13k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
9.41k (x2.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
10.59k (x3.39)
TOTAL
27.57k
54.03k (x1.96)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
55.4k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
59.01k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
22.83k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
6.7k (x0.99)
TOTAL
338.73k
143.94k (x0.42)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
25.53k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
19.99k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
9.31k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
10.81k (x3.32)
TOTAL
36.41k
65.64k (x1.8)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
58.46k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
57.31k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
20.1k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.81k (x1.02)
TOTAL
452.9k
142.69k (x0.32)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4