Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i3-8130U
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 5.1 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 5.1 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
806ea
Core
Haswell-EP
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
88.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
21.09k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
19.41k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
4.05k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
2.8k (x0.86)
TOTAL
36.41k
47.35k (x1.3)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
38.23k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
38.89k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
8.75k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
2.47k (x0.37)
TOTAL
452.9k
88.35k (x0.2)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
5890 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4