Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
860f01
Core
Haswell-EP
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
327.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
15.5k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
22.96k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
8.78k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
8.5k (x2.61)
TOTAL
36.41k
55.74k (x1.53)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
110.78k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
149.38k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
60.88k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.68k (x1)
TOTAL
452.9k
327.72k (x0.72)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
21848 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4