Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
870f10
Core
Haswell-EP
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2014
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
4.2k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
17.36k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
7.5k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
23.79k (x7.6)
TOTAL
18.17k
52.85k (x2.91)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
22.11k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
108.04k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
56.81k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
36.39k (x3.82)
TOTAL
182.59k
223.36k (x1.22)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
15.38k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
21.94k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
7.97k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
24.76k (x7.54)
TOTAL
27.11k
70.05k (x2.58)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
96.91k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
135.12k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
70.39k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
56.43k (x8.48)
TOTAL
325.78k
358.85k (x1.1)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
15.04k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
20.95k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
8.57k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
21.71k (x6.95)
TOTAL
27.57k
66.27k (x2.4)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
94.36k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
141.73k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
69.38k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
32.72k (x4.85)
TOTAL
338.73k
338.19k (x1)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
16.04k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
24.47k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
8.38k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
21.66k (x6.64)
TOTAL
36.41k
70.55k (x1.94)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
113.63k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
143.55k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
63.84k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
27.34k (x4.08)
TOTAL
452.9k
348.35k (x0.77)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4