Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 6.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 6.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f10
Core
Haswell-EP
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
71.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
2.63k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
7.84k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
3.63k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
2.93k (x0.94)
TOTAL
18.17k
17.02k (x0.94)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
5.77k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
24.15k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
9.28k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
2.83k (x0.3)
TOTAL
182.59k
42.02k (x0.23)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
11.67k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
14.02k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
4.53k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
2.93k (x0.89)
TOTAL
27.11k
33.14k (x1.22)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
20.49k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
31.32k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
9.99k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
3.03k (x0.46)
TOTAL
325.78k
64.82k (x0.2)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
11.54k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
19.69k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
4.55k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
3.25k (x1.04)
TOTAL
27.57k
39.03k (x1.42)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
19.25k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
36.27k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
10.2k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
3.07k (x0.45)
TOTAL
338.73k
68.8k (x0.2)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
10.73k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
18.15k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
3.99k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
3.89k (x1.19)
TOTAL
36.41k
36.77k (x1.01)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
20.11k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
36.87k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
10.74k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
3.31k (x0.49)
TOTAL
452.9k
71.02k (x0.16)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4