| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs A6 9220e


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 9220e is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 15.4 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
670f00
Core
Haswell-EP
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FT4
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/2
TDP
120 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2014
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
22.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
29.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
7.84k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
10.54k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
2.27k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
1.7k (x0.52)
TOTAL
36.41k
22.34k (x0.61)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
11.42k (x0.05)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
12.58k (x0.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
3.62k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
1.77k (x0.26)
TOTAL
452.9k
29.39k (x0.06)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
1903 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
2097 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
603 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
4898 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
3265 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
4390 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
9309 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4