| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Silver 4208


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
50657
Core
Haswell-EP
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
135 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
311.57k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
16.86k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
12.08k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
3.37k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
6.29k (x1.68)
TOTAL
41.36k
38.61k (x0.93)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
150.99k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
118.54k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
33.44k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
8.6k (x0.51)
TOTAL
343.64k
311.57k (x0.91)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4