| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs E5-2620 v4


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
406f1
Core
Haswell-EP
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
135 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
237.83k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
6.04k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
10.18k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
2.74k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
2.41k (x0.63)
TOTAL
33.68k
21.37k (x0.63)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
47.51k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
75.12k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
19.72k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
5.45k (x0.31)
TOTAL
277.66k
147.8k (x0.53)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
12.16k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
11.82k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
3.02k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
2.4k (x0.64)
TOTAL
41.36k
29.39k (x0.71)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
103.77k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
102.28k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
26.13k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
5.65k (x0.33)
TOTAL
343.64k
237.83k (x0.69)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4