| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-9850H


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-9850H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
906ed
Core
Haswell-EP
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
135 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
289.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
19.83k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
16.52k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
3.87k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
9.02k (x2.4)
TOTAL
41.36k
49.24k (x1.19)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
130.19k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
121.44k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
28.05k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
9.62k (x0.57)
TOTAL
343.64k
289.3k (x0.84)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
6429 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4