| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-4702MQ


Description
Both models E5-2667 v3 and i7-4702MQ are based on Haswell architecture.

"Haswell is known as fourth-generation core too. It uses 22nm Tri-Gate FinFET (non-planar, ""3D"") technology. It includes four arithmetic logic unit (ALU) and three address generation unit (AGU). This generation is able to run Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) instruction set among BMI1, BMI2, ABM and FMA3. At this time, Intel used new sockets: LGA 1150 for desktops and BGA1364 for the mobile CPUs."

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2.4 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
306c3
Core
Haswell-EP
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
8/16
4 /8
TDP
135 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
145.15k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
18.98k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
9.5k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.32k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.99k (x1.06)
TOTAL
41.36k
36.8k (x0.89)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
74.75k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
47.72k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
19.65k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
3.02k (x0.18)
TOTAL
343.64k
145.15k (x0.42)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4