Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-10610U
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2.1 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2.1 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
806ec
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
135 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
162k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
23.1k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
20k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.61k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
8.94k (x2.38)
TOTAL
41.36k
56.65k (x1.37)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
73.36k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
68.28k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
13.73k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
6.62k (x0.39)
TOTAL
343.64k
162k (x0.47)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
6480 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4