| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-9500


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
906ea
Core
Haswell-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
352.84k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
16.14k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
24.18k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.87k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
12.5k (x3.26)
TOTAL
33.68k
58.69k (x1.74)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
92.21k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
137.92k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
33.12k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
5.56k (x0.31)
TOTAL
277.66k
268.8k (x0.97)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
29.17k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
25.49k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.84k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
13.15k (x3.5)
TOTAL
41.36k
73.65k (x1.78)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
166.66k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
146.9k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
34.04k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
5.25k (x0.31)
TOTAL
343.64k
352.84k (x1.03)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4