Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-8259U
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
806ea
Core
Haswell-EP
Coffee Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
135 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
54.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
229k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
21.06k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
19.79k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.72k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
8.98k (x2.39)
TOTAL
41.36k
54.55k (x1.32)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
96.43k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
85.46k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
22.31k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
24.81k (x1.47)
TOTAL
343.64k
229k (x0.67)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
3444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
3052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
797 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
886 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
8179 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
5543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5208 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1241 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
2363 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
14355 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4