| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-5675R


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
40671
Core
Haswell-EP
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
194.2k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
12.88k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
18.27k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.12k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
5.45k (x1.42)
TOTAL
33.68k
41.72k (x1.24)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
49.91k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
70.3k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
19.69k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
16.92k (x0.96)
TOTAL
277.66k
156.83k (x0.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
21.91k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
18.59k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.2k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.72k (x1.52)
TOTAL
41.36k
51.43k (x1.24)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
84.92k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
72.09k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
20.13k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
17.07k (x1.01)
TOTAL
343.64k
194.2k (x0.57)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4