| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-10400F


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0653
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
369.97k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
26.28k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
23.38k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.52k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
12.96k (x3.45)
TOTAL
41.36k
68.14k (x1.65)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
163.67k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
159.74k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
39k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
7.56k (x0.45)
TOTAL
343.64k
369.97k (x1.08)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4