| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-10300H


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0652
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
135 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
15.65k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
23.13k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.66k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
11.43k (x2.98)
TOTAL
33.68k
55.87k (x1.66)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
26.77k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
43.81k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
10.17k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
11.91k (x0.67)
TOTAL
277.66k
92.66k (x0.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
27.14k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
24.75k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.73k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
11.84k (x3.15)
TOTAL
41.36k
69.47k (x1.68)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
105.77k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
107.47k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
24.82k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
8.02k (x0.47)
TOTAL
343.64k
246.07k (x0.72)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4