| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i3-10105


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0653
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
253.93k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
16.11k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
24.12k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.71k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
7.89k (x2.06)
TOTAL
33.68k
53.83k (x1.6)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
58.25k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
105.73k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
27.8k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
3.51k (x0.2)
TOTAL
277.66k
195.29k (x0.7)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
28.9k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
25.85k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.88k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
8.29k (x2.21)
TOTAL
41.36k
68.92k (x1.67)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
111.69k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
110.23k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
28.45k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
3.56k (x0.21)
TOTAL
343.64k
253.93k (x0.74)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4