Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i3-10100
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0653
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
22.74k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
20.31k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.71k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
7.65k (x2.04)
TOTAL
41.36k
55.41k (x1.34)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
71.95k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
67.7k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
16.43k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
6.25k (x0.37)
TOTAL
343.64k
162.33k (x0.47)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4