Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 3700X gets 491.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 3700X gets 491.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
870f10
Core
Haswell-EP
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2014
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
74.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
491.15k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
16.81k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
26.39k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
8.82k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
22.73k (x6.06)
TOTAL
41.36k
74.75k (x1.81)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
170.29k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
213.21k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
96.03k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
11.62k (x0.69)
TOTAL
343.64k
491.15k (x1.43)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
3280 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
1477 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
179 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
7556 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
3821 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5998 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
2005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
16990 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4