Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
800f82
Core
Haswell-EP
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
135 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
15.75k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
26.29k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.91k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
18.48k (x4.92)
TOTAL
41.36k
66.44k (x1.61)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
94.49k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
182.53k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
45.95k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
10.15k (x0.6)
TOTAL
343.64k
333.12k (x0.97)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4