Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2.4 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2.4 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f81
Core
Haswell-EP
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
144.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
13.25k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
21.67k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.79k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.98k (x1.06)
TOTAL
41.36k
43.7k (x1.06)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
46.47k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
78.38k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
16.69k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
3.3k (x0.19)
TOTAL
343.64k
144.84k (x0.42)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
9656 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4