| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-11300H


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806c1
Core
Haswell-EP
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
135 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
25.83k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
23.56k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
9.2k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.06k (x1.35)
TOTAL
41.36k
63.64k (x1.54)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
116.87k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
121.08k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
41.8k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
6k (x0.35)
TOTAL
343.64k
285.75k (x0.83)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4