| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs E5-1660 v4


Description
The E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 1.4 times faster than the E5-1660 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
406f1
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
10 /20
8/16
TDP
95 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2013
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
19.48k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
459.31k points
320.49k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2660 v2
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.26k
12.41k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
17.23k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.77k
4.89k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
3.07k (x1.2)
TOTAL
19.48k
37.6k (x1.93)

Multithread

E5-2660 v2

E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
102.11k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
191.43k
156.5k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.22k
42.08k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.46k
19.8k (x2.65)
TOTAL
459.31k
320.49k (x0.7)

Performance/W
E5-2660 v2
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1897 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2015 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
844 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
4835 points/W
2289 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2660 v2
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2420 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2302 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
923 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
6495 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4