Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Core i5-10500
Description
The E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the i5-10500 gets 297.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the i5-10500 gets 297.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
a0653
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
10 /20
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
19.48k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
459.31k points
387.99k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2660 v2
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
7.26k
16.33k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
24.73k (x3.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.77k
5.99k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
13.64k (x5.34)
TOTAL
19.48k
60.69k (x3.11)
Multithread
E5-2660 v2
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
91.64k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
191.43k
158.71k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.22k
39.84k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.46k
7.76k (x1.04)
TOTAL
459.31k
297.94k (x0.65)
Performance/W
E5-2660 v2
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
1897 points/W
1410 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2015 points/W
2442 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
844 points/W
613 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
4835 points/W
4584 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2660 v2
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
2420 points/GHz
3629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2302 points/GHz
5496 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
923 points/GHz
1332 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
3031 points/GHz
TOTAL
6495 points/GHz
13487 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4