Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the 1700 gets 381.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 1.2 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the 1700 gets 381.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 1.2 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
800f11
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
10 /20
8/16
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2013
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
19.48k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
459.31k points
333.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2660 v2
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
7.26k
13.95k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
22.02k (x3.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.77k
5.17k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
16.61k (x6.51)
TOTAL
19.48k
57.75k (x2.96)
Multithread
E5-2660 v2
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
120.59k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
191.43k
197.34k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.22k
56.83k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.46k
6.41k (x0.86)
TOTAL
459.31k
381.16k (x0.83)
Performance/W
E5-2660 v2
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
1897 points/W
1855 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2015 points/W
3036 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
844 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
4835 points/W
5864 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2660 v2
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
2420 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2302 points/GHz
5952 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
923 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
4490 points/GHz
TOTAL
6495 points/GHz
15609 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4