Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Core i9-13900K
Description
The E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1501.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.3 times faster than the E5-2660 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1501.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.3 times faster than the E5-2660 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
b0671
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10 /20
24/32
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
36864 kB
Date
September 2013
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
19.48k points
132.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
459.31k points
1847.86k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2660 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.26k
31.8k (x4.38)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
32.83k (x4.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.77k
18.37k (x6.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
21.13k (x8.28)
TOTAL
19.48k
104.13k (x5.34)
Multithread
E5-2660 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
532.97k (x2.96)
Test#2 (FP)
191.43k
596.78k (x3.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.22k
342.96k (x4.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.46k
28.6k (x3.83)
TOTAL
459.31k
1501.31k (x3.27)
Performance/W
E5-2660 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1897 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2015 points/W
4774 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
844 points/W
2744 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
229 points/W
TOTAL
4835 points/W
12011 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2660 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2420 points/GHz
5483 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2302 points/GHz
5660 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
923 points/GHz
3166 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
3644 points/GHz
TOTAL
6495 points/GHz
17953 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4