Xeon E5-2651 v2 vs Celeron N5095
Description
The E5-2651 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2651 v2 gets a score of 415 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2651 v2 is 4.4 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2651 v2 gets a score of 415 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2651 v2 is 4.4 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
906c0
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/4
TDP
W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2013
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
17.75k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.18k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2651 v2
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
6.75k
10.08k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
10.11k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
4.06k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.26k
2.36k (x1.04)
TOTAL
17.68k
26.6k (x1.5)
Multithread
E5-2651 v2
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
168.18k
36.86k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
159.6k
38.51k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77.04k
15.17k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.19k
2.72k (x0.27)
TOTAL
415.01k
93.26k (x0.22)
Performance/W
E5-2651 v2
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)