Xeon E5-2651 v2 vs Celeron N4100
Description
The E5-2651 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2651 v2 gets a score of 415 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2651 v2 is 10.2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2651 v2 gets a score of 415 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2651 v2 is 10.2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
706a1
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/4
TDP
W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
kB
Date
October 2013
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
17.75k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.18k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2651 v2
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
6.75k
4.72k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
6.99k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
2.69k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.26k
2.81k (x1.24)
TOTAL
17.68k
17.21k (x0.97)
Multithread
E5-2651 v2
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
168.18k
12.54k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
159.6k
17.99k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77.04k
6.71k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.19k
3.33k (x0.33)
TOTAL
415.01k
40.57k (x0.1)
Performance/W
E5-2651 v2
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)