Xeon E5-2651 v2 vs Celeron E3300
Description
The E5-2651 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E3300 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2651 v2 gets a score of 415 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2651 v2 is 16.9 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2651 v2 gets a score of 415 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2651 v2 is 16.9 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
1067a
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/2
TDP
W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2013
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.75k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.18k points
24.6k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2651 v2
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
6.75k
2.9k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
6.38k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
2.59k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.26k
1.08k (x0.48)
TOTAL
17.68k
12.94k (x0.73)
Multithread
E5-2651 v2
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
168.18k
5.76k (x0.03)
Test#2 (FP)
159.6k
12.67k (x0.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77.04k
5.16k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.19k
1.01k (x0.1)
TOTAL
415.01k
24.6k (x0.06)
Performance/W
E5-2651 v2
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)