Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs ARM M1
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the M1 is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the M1 gets 142.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.3 times faster than the M1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the M1 gets 142.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.3 times faster than the M1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
f4a
Core
Broadwell-EP
-
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
-
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
- kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
- kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
- kB
Date
March 2016
January 1900
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
41.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
142.32k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
M1
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
9.46k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
24.42k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
3.76k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
3.8k (x1.32)
TOTAL
27.18k
41.44k (x1.52)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
M1
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
34.73k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
87.52k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
13.74k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
6.34k (x1.37)
TOTAL
182.37k
142.32k (x0.78)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
M1
Test#1 (Integers)
722 points/W