| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs E5506


Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
106a5
Core
Broadwell-EP
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
8/16
4 /4
TDP
85 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2016
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
90.45k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
1.21k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
2.75k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
1.94k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
0.78k (x0.38)
TOTAL
14.79k
6.68k (x0.45)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
12.25k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
25.55k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
17.1k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
5.01k (x1.08)
TOTAL
123.78k
59.9k (x0.48)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
4.48k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
2.99k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
1.81k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
0.69k (x0.24)
TOTAL
27.18k
9.97k (x0.37)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
41k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
28.17k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
17.4k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
3.88k (x0.84)
TOTAL
182.37k
90.45k (x0.5)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
722 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1061 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
2146 points/W
1131 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
2739 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4021 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
963 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
9059 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4