| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Pentium 4417U


Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.4 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
806ea
Core
Broadwell-EP
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
41.15k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
7.94k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
11.35k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
2.39k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
2.8k (x0.97)
TOTAL
27.18k
24.49k (x0.9)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
13.1k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
21.1k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
4.49k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
2.46k (x0.53)
TOTAL
182.37k
41.15k (x0.23)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
722 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1061 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
2146 points/W
2743 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
2739 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4021 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
963 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
9059 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4