Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i7-950
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-950 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.4 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.4 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
106a5
Core
Broadwell-EP
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2016
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
76.29k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
8.01k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
5.38k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
3.11k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
2.96k (x1.02)
TOTAL
27.18k
19.46k (x0.72)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
31.53k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
24.16k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
15.84k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
4.75k (x1.03)
TOTAL
182.37k
76.29k (x0.42)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
722 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1061 points/W
186 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
2146 points/W
587 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
2739 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4021 points/GHz
1614 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
934 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
963 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
9059 points/GHz
5839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4