Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i7-9750H
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
906ed
Core
Broadwell-EP
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2016
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
276.46k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
4.53k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
18.24k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
5.76k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
13.01k (x6.42)
TOTAL
14.79k
41.54k (x2.81)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
24.3k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
97.88k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
29.85k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
11.93k (x2.57)
TOTAL
123.78k
163.95k (x1.32)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
16.32k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
23.42k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
6.04k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
13.24k (x4.58)
TOTAL
27.18k
59.03k (x2.17)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
86.92k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
126.14k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
29.62k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
11.86k (x2.56)
TOTAL
182.37k
254.54k (x1.4)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
16.31k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
24.48k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
5.87k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.41k
13.02k (x5.41)
TOTAL
21.37k
59.67k (x2.79)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.51k
87.54k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
75.12k
131.05k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
28.47k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
11.8k (x2.16)
TOTAL
147.8k
258.87k (x1.75)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
25.22k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
21.97k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
5.02k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
10.71k (x4.47)
TOTAL
29.39k
62.92k (x2.14)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
125.56k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
115.86k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
25.63k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
9.4k (x1.67)
TOTAL
237.83k
276.46k (x1.16)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
6144 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4