Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i7-9750H
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
906ea
Core
Broadwell-EP
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2016
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
65.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
286.43k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
25.93k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
22.84k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
5.11k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
11.46k (x4.78)
TOTAL
29.39k
65.33k (x2.22)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
130.68k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
119.91k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
28.76k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
7.08k (x1.25)
TOTAL
237.83k
286.43k (x1.2)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
2904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
2665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
639 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
6365 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
14519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4