| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i5-9300H


Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i5-9300H gets 244.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
906ea
Core
Broadwell-EP
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
FCBGA1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2016
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
67.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
244.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
3.38k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
12.84k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
4.6k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
6.23k (x3.07)
TOTAL
14.79k
27.05k (x1.83)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
11.6k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
48.01k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
17.05k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
3.88k (x0.83)
TOTAL
123.78k
80.54k (x0.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
26.62k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
23.38k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
5.52k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
12.05k (x5.03)
TOTAL
29.39k
67.57k (x2.3)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
107.95k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
104.02k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
24.4k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
7.74k (x1.37)
TOTAL
237.83k
244.1k (x1.03)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
2399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
2312 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
542 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
5424 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
6493 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5703 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
2938 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
16480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4