| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i5-1038NG7


Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
706e5
Core
Broadwell-EP
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2016
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
23.2k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
21.2k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
9.4k (x3.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
11.54k (x4.82)
TOTAL
29.39k
65.35k (x2.22)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
94.68k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
103.38k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
35.79k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
9.33k (x1.65)
TOTAL
237.83k
243.18k (x1.02)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4