Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i3-8350K
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
906eb
Core
Broadwell-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
91 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2016
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
68.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
237.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
27.29k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
24.19k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
5.75k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
11.13k (x4.65)
TOTAL
29.39k
68.36k (x2.33)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
107.78k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
95.93k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
22.65k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
11.26k (x1.99)
TOTAL
237.83k
237.63k (x1)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
1184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
1054 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
2611 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
6823 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
6048 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
17091 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4