| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i3-4160


Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-4160 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i3-4160 gets 74 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
306c3
Core
Broadwell-EP
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2016
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
34.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
74k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
4.13k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
10.33k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
4.64k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
3.95k (x1.95)
TOTAL
14.79k
23.06k (x1.56)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
7.46k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
26.62k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
11.46k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
6.27k (x1.35)
TOTAL
123.78k
51.81k (x0.42)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
13.02k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
12k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
4.91k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.41k
4.23k (x1.76)
TOTAL
21.37k
34.16k (x1.6)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
47.51k
27.45k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
75.12k
28.96k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
11.83k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
5.77k (x1.06)
TOTAL
147.8k
74k (x0.5)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
559 points/W
508 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
884 points/W
536 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
232 points/W
219 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
1739 points/W
1370 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
3616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3393 points/GHz
3334 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
915 points/GHz
1363 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
802 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
TOTAL
7123 points/GHz
9488 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4