Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i3-10105
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
a0653
Core
Broadwell-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2016
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
253.93k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
4.5k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
18.39k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
5.78k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
8.3k (x4.1)
TOTAL
14.79k
36.97k (x2.5)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
16.13k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
75.62k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
27.88k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
3.57k (x0.77)
TOTAL
123.78k
123.2k (x1)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
16.19k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
23.07k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
6.04k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
8.46k (x2.93)
TOTAL
27.18k
53.77k (x1.98)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
57.59k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
100.63k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
28.59k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
3.56k (x0.77)
TOTAL
182.37k
190.38k (x1.04)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
16.11k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
24.12k (x2.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
5.71k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.41k
7.89k (x3.28)
TOTAL
21.37k
53.83k (x2.52)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
47.51k
58.25k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
75.12k
105.73k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
27.8k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
3.51k (x0.64)
TOTAL
147.8k
195.29k (x1.32)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
28.9k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
25.85k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
5.88k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
8.29k (x3.46)
TOTAL
29.39k
68.92k (x2.34)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
111.69k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
110.23k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
28.45k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
3.56k (x0.63)
TOTAL
237.83k
253.93k (x1.07)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4