| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Celeron N5095


Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
906c0
Core
Broadwell-EP
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2016
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
93.26k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
10.08k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
10.11k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
4.06k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
2.36k (x0.82)
TOTAL
27.18k
26.6k (x0.98)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
36.86k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
38.51k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
15.17k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
2.72k (x0.59)
TOTAL
182.37k
93.26k (x0.51)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
722 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1061 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
2146 points/W
6217 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
2739 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4021 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
963 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
9059 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4