Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Celeron G1610T
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.7 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.7 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
306a9
Core
Broadwell-EP
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/2
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2016
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
38.59k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
2.34k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
6.54k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
3k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
2.74k (x1.35)
TOTAL
14.79k
14.62k (x0.99)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
4.67k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
12.66k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
5.95k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
2.53k (x0.54)
TOTAL
123.78k
25.8k (x0.21)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
7.87k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
7.14k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
3.04k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
2.79k (x0.96)
TOTAL
27.18k
20.84k (x0.77)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
15.12k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
14.05k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
5.94k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
3.48k (x0.75)
TOTAL
182.37k
38.59k (x0.21)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
722 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1061 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
2146 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2739 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4021 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
963 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
9059 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4