Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.8 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.8 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
a50f00
Core
Broadwell-EP
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2016
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
21.2k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
25k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
11.44k (x3.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
24.22k (x10.11)
TOTAL
29.39k
81.87k (x2.79)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
145.13k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
198.36k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
85.67k (x3.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
5.79k (x1.03)
TOTAL
237.83k
434.96k (x1.83)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4