Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
800f82
Core
Broadwell-EP
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2016
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
15.75k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
26.29k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
5.91k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
18.48k (x7.71)
TOTAL
29.39k
66.44k (x2.26)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
94.49k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
182.53k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
45.95k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
10.15k (x1.8)
TOTAL
237.83k
333.12k (x1.4)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4