| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.3 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
100fa0
Core
Broadwell-EP
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2016
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
1.98k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
4.57k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
2.57k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
3.51k (x1.73)
TOTAL
14.79k
12.64k (x0.85)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
11.86k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
27.4k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
15.39k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
3.46k (x0.74)
TOTAL
123.78k
58.11k (x0.47)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
5.17k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
5.33k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
2.76k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
3.51k (x1.22)
TOTAL
27.18k
16.77k (x0.62)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
29.82k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
30.79k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
15.88k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
3.69k (x0.8)
TOTAL
182.37k
80.19k (x0.44)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
722 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1061 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
2146 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2739 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4021 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
963 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
9059 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4